We began the day by going over the outline for our presentation. We decided that when telling it like a story, we should go through what the freshman did, looking at their objectives. Then, we will move to our task, comparing the broadcast and fixed focal length system on a broad basis. After that, we will specifically compare the two systems in the sense of tracking players, identifying the team of the player, and also the name of the player. Finally, we will discuss the future ways in which we can take this project.
After that planning, I began working on the specific player identification. I couldn't find any specific code on this matter, so I decided to make best guess judgments as to whether or not the number could be identified. I also realized that the pixel calculations from before were only the pixels on the computer screen, as I was taking screenshots and then inputting the image into image J. Thus, I redid the calculations looking at stills from the video, finding that the fixed focal length camera system had almost a six times larger size than the broadcast system at 2092800 pixels.
I did some calculations on the broadcast film, finding that only 48 percent of the players were in each frame. The eyeball method proved to be quite inaccurate, so I really needed to find the code so that I could use that code to compare stills from both cameras. Joe was able to find that code for me. Hopefully it works, so that I can do the appropriate calculations.
No comments:
Post a Comment